Tesla M1060 vs GeForce 9200M GS

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1383not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.83no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameG98GT200B
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date3 June 2008 (17 years ago)1 June 2008 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,699

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8240
Core clock speed550 MHz610 MHz
Number of transistors210 million1,400 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)13 Watt188 Watt
Texture fill rate4.40048.80
Floating-point processing power0.0224 TFLOPS0.6221 TFLOPS
Gigaflops31no data
ROPs432
TMUs880
L2 Cache16 KB256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount256 MB2 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit512 Bit
Memory clock speed700 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth11.2 GB/s102.4 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model4.04.0
OpenGL3.33.3
OpenCL1.11.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA+1.3

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 2 GB
Chip lithography 65 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 13 Watt 188 Watt

9200M GS has 1346.2% lower power consumption.

Tesla M1060, on the other hand, has a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 18.2% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 9200M GS and Tesla M1060. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 9200M GS is a notebook graphics card while Tesla M1060 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 9200M GS
GeForce 9200M GS
NVIDIA Tesla M1060
Tesla M1060

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 29 votes

Rate GeForce 9200M GS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 4 votes

Rate Tesla M1060 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 9200M GS or Tesla M1060, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.