Riva TNT2 M64 vs GeForce 9200M GS

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1384not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.84no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Fahrenheit (1998−2000)
GPU code nameG98NV5 B6
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date3 June 2008 (17 years ago)12 October 1999 (26 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8no data
Core clock speed550 MHz125 MHz
Number of transistors210 million15 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm250 nm
Power consumption (TDP)13 Wattno data
Texture fill rate4.4000.25
Floating-point processing power0.0224 TFLOPSno data
Gigaflops31no data
ROPs42
TMUs82
L2 Cache16 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16AGP 4x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3SDR
Maximum RAM amount256 MB16 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed700 MHz143 MHz
Memory bandwidth11.2 GB/s1.144 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x VGA

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)6.0
Shader Model4.0no data
OpenGL3.31.2
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 June 2008 12 October 1999
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 16 MB
Chip lithography 65 nm 250 nm

9200M GS has an age advantage of 8 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 285% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 9200M GS and Riva TNT2 M64. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 9200M GS is a notebook graphics card while Riva TNT2 M64 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 29 votes

Rate GeForce 9200M GS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 38 votes

Rate Riva TNT2 M64 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 9200M GS or Riva TNT2 M64, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.