Radeon R2E Mobile Graphics vs GeForce 9200M GS

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1361not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.82no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)
GPU code nameG98Beema
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date3 June 2008 (17 years ago)28 January 2015 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8128
Core clock speed550 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data600 MHz
Number of transistors210 million930 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)13 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate4.4002.400
Floating-point processing power0.0224 TFLOPS0.0768 TFLOPS
Gigaflops31no data
ROPs44
TMUs88

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16IGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount256 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed700 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth11.2 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 (12_0)
Shader Model4.06.5 (6.0)
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.12.1
VulkanN/A1.2.170
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 June 2008 28 January 2015
Chip lithography 65 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 13 Watt 15 Watt

9200M GS has 15.4% lower power consumption.

R2E Mobile Graphics, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, and a 132.1% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 9200M GS and Radeon R2E Mobile Graphics. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 9200M GS
GeForce 9200M GS
AMD Radeon R2E Mobile Graphics
Radeon R2E Mobile Graphics

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 29 votes

Rate GeForce 9200M GS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon R2E Mobile Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 9200M GS or Radeon R2E Mobile Graphics, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.