Radeon Pro V340 16 GB vs GeForce 9200M GS

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1384not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.84no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameG98Vega 10
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date3 June 2008 (17 years ago)26 August 2018 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores83584 ×2
Core clock speed550 MHz852 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1500 MHz
Number of transistors210 million12,500 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)13 Watt230 Watt
Texture fill rate4.400336.0 ×2
Floating-point processing power0.0224 TFLOPS10.75 TFLOPS ×2
Gigaflops31no data
ROPs464 ×2
TMUs8224 ×2
L1 Cacheno data896 KB
L2 Cache16 KB4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3HBM2
Maximum RAM amount256 MB16 GB ×2
Memory bus width64 Bit2048 Bit ×2
Memory clock speed700 MHz945 MHz
Memory bandwidth11.2 GB/s483.8 GB/s ×2
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model4.06.7
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.12.1
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 June 2008 26 August 2018
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 16 GB
Chip lithography 65 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 13 Watt 230 Watt

9200M GS has 1669% lower power consumption.

Pro V340 16 GB, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 years, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 364% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 9200M GS and Radeon Pro V340 16 GB. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 9200M GS is a notebook graphics card while Radeon Pro V340 16 GB is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 29 votes

Rate GeForce 9200M GS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.7 3 votes

Rate Radeon Pro V340 16 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 9200M GS or Radeon Pro V340 16 GB, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.