Radeon Graphics 512SP Mobile vs GeForce 9200M GS

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1384not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.84no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)GCN 5.1 (2018−2022)
GPU code nameG98Lucienne
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date3 June 2008 (17 years ago)12 January 2021 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8512
Core clock speed550 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1900 MHz
Number of transistors210 million9,800 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)13 Watt25 Watt
Texture fill rate4.40060.80
Floating-point processing power0.0224 TFLOPS1.946 TFLOPS
Gigaflops31no data
ROPs48
TMUs832
L2 Cache16 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16IGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount256 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed700 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth11.2 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model4.06.7 (6.4)
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.12.1
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 June 2008 12 January 2021
Chip lithography 65 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 13 Watt 25 Watt

9200M GS has 92% lower power consumption.

Graphics 512SP Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 12 years, and a 829% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 9200M GS and Radeon Graphics 512SP Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 29 votes

Rate GeForce 9200M GS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 70 votes

Rate Radeon Graphics 512SP Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 9200M GS or Radeon Graphics 512SP Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.