Quadro 3000M X2 vs GeForce 9200

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1331not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.77no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code nameC78EXMF104
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date6 May 2008 (17 years ago)22 February 2011 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores16240 ×2
Core clock speed500 MHz450 MHz
Number of transistors210 million1,950 million
Manufacturing process technology80 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)40 Watt150 Watt
Texture fill rate4.00018.00 ×2
Floating-point processing power0.0384 TFLOPS0.432 TFLOPS ×2
ROPs432 ×2
TMUs840 ×2
L1 Cacheno data320 KB
L2 Cacheno data512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIMXM-B (3.0)
WidthIGPno data
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared2 GB ×2
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit ×2
Memory clock speedSystem Shared625 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data80 GB/s ×2
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-VideoPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Model4.05.1
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCLN/A1.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-2.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 May 2008 22 February 2011
Chip lithography 80 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 40 Watt 150 Watt

GeForce 9200 has 275% lower power consumption.

3000M X2, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 9200 and Quadro 3000M X2. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 9200 is a desktop graphics card while Quadro 3000M X2 is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 26 votes

Rate GeForce 9200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro 3000M X2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 9200 or Quadro 3000M X2, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.