GeForce 9800S vs 9200

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1323not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.77no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameC78G94
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date6 May 2008 (17 years ago)15 July 2008 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1664
Core clock speed500 MHz600 MHz
Number of transistors210 million505 million
Manufacturing process technology80 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)40 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate4.00019.20
Floating-point processing power0.0384 TFLOPS0.192 TFLOPS
ROPs416
TMUs832
L2 Cacheno data64 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIPCIe 2.0 x16
WidthIGPno data
SLI options-+

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR3
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared1 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared800 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data51.2 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-VideoVGAHDMISingle Link DVI
Multi monitor supportno data+
HDMI-+
Maximum VGA resolutionno data2048x1536
Audio input for HDMIno dataS/PDIF + HDA

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model4.04.0
OpenGL3.32.1
OpenCLN/A1.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 May 2008 15 July 2008
Chip lithography 80 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 40 Watt 75 Watt

GeForce 9200 has 87.5% lower power consumption.

GeForce 9800S, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 months, and a 23.1% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 9200 and GeForce 9800S. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 9200 is a desktop graphics card while GeForce 9800S is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 9200
GeForce 9200
NVIDIA GeForce 9800S
GeForce 9800S

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 26 votes

Rate GeForce 9200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 2 votes

Rate GeForce 9800S on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 9200 or GeForce 9800S, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.