ATI Radeon X800 XT Mac Edition vs GeForce 910M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1037not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.33no data
ArchitectureKepler 2.0 (2013−2015)R400 (2004−2008)
GPU code nameGK208BR423
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date13 March 2015 (10 years ago)1 December 2004 (21 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384no data
Core clock speed641 MHz475 MHz
Number of transistors915 million160 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)33 Watt54 Watt
Texture fill rate20.517.600
Floating-point processing power0.4923 TFLOPSno data
ROPs816
TMUs3216
L1 Cache32 KBno data
L2 Cache128 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8AGP Pro 8x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amountDDR3 MB256 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1001 MHz500 MHz
Memory bandwidth16.02 GB/s32 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GPU Boost2.0no data
Optimus+-
GameWorks+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)9.0b (9_2)
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.52.0
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 13 March 2015 1 December 2004
Chip lithography 28 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 33 Watt 54 Watt

GeForce 910M has an age advantage of 10 years, a 364.3% more advanced lithography process, and 63.6% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 910M and Radeon X800 XT Mac Edition. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 910M is a notebook graphics card while Radeon X800 XT Mac Edition is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 910M
GeForce 910M
ATI Radeon X800 XT Mac Edition
Radeon X800 XT Mac Edition

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.4 65 votes

Rate GeForce 910M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon X800 XT Mac Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 910M or Radeon X800 XT Mac Edition, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.