Radeon R7 450 OEM vs GeForce 910M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1026not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.30no data
ArchitectureKepler 2.0 (2013−2015)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameGK208BCape Verde
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date13 March 2015 (10 years ago)30 June 2016 (9 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384512
Core clock speed641 MHz925 MHz
Number of transistors915 million1,500 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)33 Watt65 Watt
Texture fill rate20.5129.60
Floating-point processing power0.4923 TFLOPS0.9472 TFLOPS
ROPs816
TMUs3232
L1 Cache32 KB128 KB
L2 Cache128 KB256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x16
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amountDDR3 MB2 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1001 MHz1125 MHz
Memory bandwidth16.02 GB/s72 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x HDMI 1.4a, 1x DisplayPort 1.2
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GPU Boost2.0no data
Optimus+-
GameWorks+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (11_1)
Shader Model5.16.5 (5.1)
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.22.1 (1.2)
Vulkan1.1.1261.2.170
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 13 March 2015 30 June 2016
Power consumption (TDP) 33 Watt 65 Watt

GeForce 910M has 97% lower power consumption.

R7 450 OEM, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 910M and Radeon R7 450 OEM. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 910M is a notebook graphics card while Radeon R7 450 OEM is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 910M
GeForce 910M
AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM
Radeon R7 450 OEM

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.4 62 votes

Rate GeForce 910M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 208 votes

Rate Radeon R7 450 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 910M or Radeon R7 450 OEM, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.