ATI Radeon 7000 vs GeForce 910M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking10391607
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.34no data
ArchitectureKepler 2.0 (2013−2015)Rage 6 (2000−2007)
GPU code nameGK208BRV100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date13 March 2015 (11 years ago)19 February 2001 (25 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384no data
Core clock speed641 MHz183 MHz
Number of transistors915 million30 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm180 nm
Power consumption (TDP)33 Watt23 Watt
Texture fill rate20.510.55
Floating-point processing power0.4923 TFLOPSno data
ROPs81
TMUs323
L1 Cache32 KBno data
L2 Cache128 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8AGP 4x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3DDR
Maximum RAM amountDDR3 MB32 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1001 MHz183 MHz
Memory bandwidth16.02 GB/s2.928 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GPU Boost2.0no data
Optimus+-
GameWorks+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)7.0
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.51.3
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GeForce 910M 598
+29800%
Samples: 27
ATI 7000 2
Samples: 1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD9no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 no data
Resident Evil 4 Remake 0−1 no data

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 2−3 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 no data
Far Cry 5 3−4 no data
Fortnite 5−6 no data
Forza Horizon 4 8−9 no data
Forza Horizon 5 2−3 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11 no data
Valorant 35−40 no data

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 2−3 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 30 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 no data
Dota 2 18−20 no data
Far Cry 5 3−4 no data
Fortnite 5−6 no data
Forza Horizon 4 8−9 no data
Forza Horizon 5 2−3 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 1−2 no data
Metro Exodus 2−3 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8 no data
Valorant 35−40 no data

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 2−3 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 no data
Dota 2 18−20 no data
Far Cry 5 3−4 no data
Forza Horizon 4 8−9 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8 no data
Valorant 35−40 no data

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 5−6 no data

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 4−5 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 10−11 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16 no data
Valorant 6−7 no data

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 no data
Far Cry 5 2−3 no data
Forza Horizon 4 4−5 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4 no data

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 2−3 no data

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16 no data
Valorant 7−8 no data

4K
Ultra

Dota 2 2−3 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3 no data

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3 no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 13 March 2015 19 February 2001
Chip lithography 28 nm 180 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 33 Watt 23 Watt

GeForce 910M has an age advantage of 14 years, and a 543% more advanced lithography process.

ATI 7000, on the other hand, has 43% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 910M and Radeon 7000. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 910M is a notebook graphics card while Radeon 7000 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.4 65 votes

Rate GeForce 910M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 202 votes

Rate Radeon 7000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 910M or Radeon 7000, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.