RTX A2000 Max-Q vs GeForce 910M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1037not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.33no data
ArchitectureKepler 2.0 (2013−2015)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameGK208BGA107
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date13 March 2015 (10 years ago)12 April 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3842560
Core clock speed641 MHz682 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1207 MHz
Number of transistors915 million8,700 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)33 Watt95 Watt
Texture fill rate20.5196.56
Floating-point processing power0.4923 TFLOPS6.18 TFLOPS
ROPs848
TMUs3280
Tensor Coresno data80
Ray Tracing Coresno data20
L1 Cache32 KB2.5 MB
L2 Cache128 KB2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amountDDR3 MB4 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1001 MHz1375 MHz
Memory bandwidth16.02 GB/s176.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GPU Boost2.0no data
Optimus+-
GameWorks+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.8
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.3
CUDA+8.6
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 13 March 2015 12 April 2021
Chip lithography 28 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 33 Watt 95 Watt

GeForce 910M has 187.9% lower power consumption.

RTX A2000 Max-Q, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 910M and RTX A2000 Max-Q. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 910M is a notebook graphics card while RTX A2000 Max-Q is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 910M
GeForce 910M
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Max-Q
RTX A2000 Max-Q

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.4 65 votes

Rate GeForce 910M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 2 votes

Rate RTX A2000 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 910M or RTX A2000 Max-Q, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.