GeForce GT 240M LE vs 910M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1033not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.33no data
ArchitectureKepler 2.0 (2013−2015)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameGK208BG96C
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date13 March 2015 (10 years ago)15 January 2010 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores38432
Core clock speed641 MHz600 MHz
Number of transistors915 million314 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)33 Watt23 Watt
Texture fill rate20.519.600
Floating-point processing power0.4923 TFLOPS0.096 TFLOPS
ROPs88
TMUs3216
L1 Cache32 KBno data
L2 Cache128 KB32 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3DDR2
Maximum RAM amountDDR3 MB512 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1001 MHz400 MHz
Memory bandwidth16.02 GB/s12.8 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GPU Boost2.0no data
Optimus+-
GameWorks+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model5.14.0
OpenGL4.53.3
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA+1.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 13 March 2015 15 January 2010
Chip lithography 28 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 33 Watt 23 Watt

GeForce 910M has an age advantage of 5 years, and a 96.4% more advanced lithography process.

GT 240M LE, on the other hand, has 43.5% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 910M and GeForce GT 240M LE. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 910M
GeForce 910M
NVIDIA GeForce GT 240M LE
GeForce GT 240M LE

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.4 64 votes

Rate GeForce 910M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 2 votes

Rate GeForce GT 240M LE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 910M or GeForce GT 240M LE, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.