ATI Radeon 9200 PRO vs GeForce 9100M G

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking14571602
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Architectureno dataRage 7 (2001−2006)
GPU code nameMCP77MH MCP79MHRV280
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date3 June 2008 (17 years ago)1 May 2003 (22 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8no data
Core clock speed450 MHz239 MHz
Number of transistorsno data36 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data28 Watt
Texture fill rateno data0.96
ROPsno data4
TMUsno data4

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataAGP 8x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataDDR
Maximum RAM amountno data128 MB
Memory bus widthno data128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data164 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data5.248 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX108.1
OpenGLno data1.4
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

9100M G 83
+4050%
Samples: 83
ATI 9200 PRO 2
Samples: 41

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 no data

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 no data
Forza Horizon 4 3−4 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8 no data
Valorant 24−27 no data

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 12−14 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 no data
Dota 2 9−10 no data
Forza Horizon 4 3−4 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6 no data
Valorant 24−27 no data

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 no data
Dota 2 9−10 no data
Forza Horizon 4 3−4 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6 no data
Valorant 24−27 no data

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 3−4 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3 no data

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4 1−2 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2 no data

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16 no data
Valorant 1−2 no data

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2 no data

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3 no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 June 2008 1 May 2003
Chip lithography 65 nm 150 nm

9100M G has an age advantage of 5 years, and a 131% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 9100M G and Radeon 9200 PRO. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 9100M G is a notebook graphics card while Radeon 9200 PRO is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 22 votes

Rate GeForce 9100M G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 8 votes

Rate Radeon 9200 PRO on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 9100M G or Radeon 9200 PRO, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.