Iris Plus Graphics vs GeForce 9100M G mGPU

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated648
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data21.55
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Generation 11.0 (2019−2021)
GPU code nameC79Ice Lake GT2
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date29 July 2008 (16 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8512
Core clock speed450 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data1000 MHz
Number of transistors314 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology65 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)12 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate3.60032.00
Floating-point processing power0.0176 TFLOPS1.024 TFLOPS
ROPs48
TMUs832

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x1
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory bus widthSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory clock speedSystem SharedSystem Shared
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model4.0no data
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCLN/Ano data
VulkanN/A-

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 65 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 12 Watt 15 Watt

9100M G mGPU has 25% lower power consumption.

Iris Plus Graphics, on the other hand, has a 550% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 9100M G mGPU Intel and Iris Plus Graphics. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 9100M G mGPU Intel is a notebook card while Iris Plus Graphics is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 9100M G mGPU Intel
GeForce 9100M G mGPU Intel
Intel Iris Plus Graphics
Iris Plus Graphics

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate GeForce 9100M G mGPU Intel on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 375 votes

Rate Iris Plus Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.