ATI Radeon 9800 PRO Mac Edition vs GeForce 9100

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1454not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.37no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Rage 9 (2003−2006)
GPU code nameC78R360
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date6 May 2008 (17 years ago)4 March 2004 (21 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores16no data
Core clock speed500 MHz378 MHz
Number of transistors210 million117 million
Manufacturing process technology80 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)40 Watt60 Watt
Texture fill rate4.0003.024
Floating-point processing power0.0384 TFLOPSno data
ROPs48
TMUs88

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIAGP Pro 8x
WidthIGP1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedDDR
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared128 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared338 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data21.63 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video2x DVI

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)9.0
Shader Model4.0no data
OpenGL3.32.0
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 May 2008 4 March 2004
Chip lithography 80 nm 150 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 40 Watt 60 Watt

GeForce 9100 has an age advantage of 4 years, a 87.5% more advanced lithography process, and 50% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 9100 and Radeon 9800 PRO Mac Edition. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 9100
GeForce 9100
ATI Radeon 9800 PRO Mac Edition
Radeon 9800 PRO Mac Edition

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 20 votes

Rate GeForce 9100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 2 votes

Rate Radeon 9800 PRO Mac Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 9100 or Radeon 9800 PRO Mac Edition, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.