GeForce G 102M vs 9100

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1460not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.37no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)G9x (2007−2010)
GPU code nameC78MCP75
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date6 May 2008 (17 years ago)3 March 2009 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1616
Core clock speed500 MHz450 MHz
Number of transistors210 million282 Million
Manufacturing process technology80 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)40 Wattno data
Texture fill rate4.000no data
Floating-point processing power0.0384 TFLOPSno data
ROPs4no data
TMUs8no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIno data
WidthIGPno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedDDR2, DDR3
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared512 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Sharedno data
Memory clock speedSystem Sharedno data
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Videono data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)10.0
Shader Model4.0no data
OpenGL3.3no data
OpenCLN/Ano data
VulkanN/A-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 May 2008 3 March 2009
Chip lithography 80 nm 65 nm

G 102M has an age advantage of 9 months, and a 23.1% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 9100 and GeForce G 102M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 9100 is a desktop graphics card while GeForce G 102M is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 9100
GeForce 9100
NVIDIA GeForce G 102M
GeForce G 102M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 20 votes

Rate GeForce 9100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 2 votes

Rate GeForce G 102M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 9100 or GeForce G 102M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.