GMA 3100 vs GeForce 9100

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1464not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.37no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Generation 4.0 (2006−2007)
GPU code nameC78Bearlake
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date6 May 2008 (17 years ago)9 May 2007 (18 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores16no data
Core clock speed500 MHz400 MHz
Number of transistors210 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology80 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)40 Watt13 Watt
Texture fill rate4.0001.600
Floating-point processing power0.0384 TFLOPSno data
ROPs44
TMUs84

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIPCIe 1.0 x16
WidthIGPno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory bus widthSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory clock speedSystem SharedSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)9.0c
Shader Model4.03.0
OpenGL3.32.0
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 May 2008 9 May 2007
Chip lithography 80 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 40 Watt 13 Watt

GeForce 9100 has an age advantage of 11 months, and a 13% more advanced lithography process.

GMA 3100, on the other hand, has 208% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 9100 and GMA 3100. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 9100 is a desktop graphics card while GMA 3100 is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 20 votes

Rate GeForce 9100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 328 votes

Rate GMA 3100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 9100 or GMA 3100, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.