Radeon HD 8310G vs GeForce 8800M GTX

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1129not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.30no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)TeraScale 3 (2010−2013)
GPU code nameG92Scrapper Lite
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date1 November 2007 (18 years ago)July 2013 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores96128
Core clock speed500 MHz554 MHz
Boost clock speedno data720 MHz
Number of transistors754 million1,303 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm32 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt20 Watt
Texture fill rate24.005.760
Floating-point processing power0.24 TFLOPS0.1843 TFLOPS
ROPs164
TMUs488
L2 Cache64 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-HEIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount512 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed800 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth51.2 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model4.05.0
OpenGL3.34.4
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA1.1-

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 65 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 20 Watt

HD 8310G has a 103% more advanced lithography process, and 225% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 8800M GTX and Radeon HD 8310G. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2 2 votes

Rate GeForce 8800M GTX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 1 vote

Rate Radeon HD 8310G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 8800M GTX or Radeon HD 8310G, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.