Quadro P5000 X2 Mobile vs GeForce 8800M GTX

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1055not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.27no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameG92GP104
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date1 November 2007 (17 years ago)11 January 2017 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores962048
Core clock speed500 MHz1164 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1506 MHz
Number of transistors754 million7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt200 Watt
Texture fill rate24.00192.8
Floating-point processing power0.24 TFLOPS6.169 TFLOPS
ROPs1664
TMUs48128

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-HEMXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount512 MB16 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth51.2 GB/s192.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model4.06.7
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA1.16.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 November 2007 11 January 2017
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 16 GB
Chip lithography 65 nm 16 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 200 Watt

8800M GTX has 207.7% lower power consumption.

P5000 X2 Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 306.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 8800M GTX and Quadro P5000 X2 Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 8800M GTX is a notebook graphics card while Quadro P5000 X2 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 8800M GTX
GeForce 8800M GTX
NVIDIA Quadro P5000 X2 Mobile
Quadro P5000 X2 Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2 2 votes

Rate GeForce 8800M GTX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 1 vote

Rate Quadro P5000 X2 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.