ATI Graphics Ultra Pro VLB vs GeForce 8800M GTS

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1180not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.40no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Mach (1992−1997)
GPU code nameG92Mach32
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 November 2007 (18 years ago)1993 (33 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$499

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores64no data
Core clock speed500 MHz10 MHz
Number of transistors754 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology65 nm700 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Wattno data
Texture fill rate16.00no data
Floating-point processing power0.16 TFLOPSno data
ROPs161
TMUs32no data
L2 Cache64 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-HEVLB
Widthno data1-slot

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3VRAM
Maximum RAM amount512 MB1 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz10 MHz
Memory bandwidth51.2 GB/s80 MB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x VGA

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)N/A
Shader Model4.0no data
OpenGL3.3N/A
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA1.1-

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 1 MB
Chip lithography 65 nm 700 nm

8800M GTS has a 51100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 977% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 8800M GTS and Graphics Ultra Pro VLB. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 8800M GTS is a notebook graphics card while Graphics Ultra Pro VLB is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.1 19 votes

Rate GeForce 8800M GTS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate Graphics Ultra Pro VLB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 8800M GTS or Graphics Ultra Pro VLB, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.