ATI 3D Rage PRO Turbo PCI vs GeForce 8800M GTS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1178not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.40no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)no data
GPU code nameG92Rage Pro Turbo
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 November 2007 (18 years ago)1 March 1997 (28 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores64no data
Core clock speed500 MHz75 MHz
Number of transistors754 million8 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm350 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Wattno data
Texture fill rate16.000.08
Floating-point processing power0.16 TFLOPSno data
ROPs161
TMUs321
L2 Cache64 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-HEPCI
Widthno data1-slot

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3SDR
Maximum RAM amount512 MB8 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz75 MHz
Memory bandwidth51.2 GB/s600 MB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DB13W3

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)6.0
Shader Model4.0no data
OpenGL3.31.1
OpenCL1.1None
VulkanN/A-
CUDA1.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 November 2007 1 March 1997
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 8 MB
Chip lithography 65 nm 350 nm

8800M GTS has an age advantage of 10 years, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 438.5% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 8800M GTS and 3D Rage PRO Turbo PCI. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 8800M GTS is a notebook graphics card while 3D Rage PRO Turbo PCI is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 8800M GTS
GeForce 8800M GTS
ATI 3D Rage PRO Turbo PCI
3D Rage PRO Turbo PCI

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.1 19 votes

Rate GeForce 8800M GTS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 1 vote

Rate 3D Rage PRO Turbo PCI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 8800M GTS or 3D Rage PRO Turbo PCI, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.