ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT X2 vs GeForce 8800 Ultra

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1007not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.02no data
Power efficiency0.69no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameG80RV630
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date2 May 2007 (18 years ago)26 July 2007 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$829 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores612120 ×2
Core clock speed612 MHz800 MHz
Number of transistors681 million390 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)171 Wattno data
Texture fill rate39.176.400 ×2
Floating-point processing power0.3871 TFLOPS0.192 TFLOPS ×2
ROPs244 ×2
TMUs328 ×2
L2 Cache96 KB64 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Length270 mmno data
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pin1x 6-pin
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount512 MB512 MB ×2
Memory bus width384 Bit128 Bit ×2
Memory clock speed1080 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth103.7 GB/s25.6 GB/s ×2

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Video4x DVI, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)10.0 (10_0)
Shader Model4.04.0
OpenGL3.33.3
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 May 2007 26 July 2007
Chip lithography 90 nm 65 nm

ATI HD 2600 XT X2 has an age advantage of 2 months, and a 38.5% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 8800 Ultra and Radeon HD 2600 XT X2. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 8800 Ultra
GeForce 8800 Ultra
ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT X2
Radeon HD 2600 XT X2

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 34 votes

Rate GeForce 8800 Ultra on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 2 votes

Rate Radeon HD 2600 XT X2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 8800 Ultra or Radeon HD 2600 XT X2, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.