GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER vs 8800 GTX

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1035not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.02no data
Power efficiency0.66no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Blackwell 2.0 (2025)
GPU code nameG80GB205
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date8 November 2006 (18 years ago)2025 (recently)
Launch price (MSRP)$599 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5756400
Core clock speed576 MHz2325 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2512 MHz
Number of transistors681 million31,100 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)155 Watt275 Watt
Texture fill rate36.86502.4
Floating-point processing power0.3456 TFLOPS32.15 TFLOPS
ROPs2480
TMUs32200
Tensor Coresno data200
Ray Tracing Coresno data50

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Length270 mm245 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pin1x 16-pin
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR7
Maximum RAM amount768 MB18 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth86.4 GB/s672.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Video1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1b
HDMI-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.06.8
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.4
CUDA+12.0
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 768 MB 18 GB
Chip lithography 90 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 155 Watt 275 Watt

8800 GTX has 77.4% lower power consumption.

RTX 5070 SUPER, on the other hand, has a 2300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1700% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 8800 GTX and GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTX
GeForce 8800 GTX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER
GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 143 votes

Rate GeForce 8800 GTX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 26 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 8800 GTX or GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.