GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 vs 8800 GTX

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking973not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.03no data
Power efficiency0.68no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameG80AD102
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date8 November 2006 (18 years ago)10 June 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$599 $799

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5758448
Core clock speed576 MHz2340 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2610 MHz
Number of transistors681 million76,300 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)155 Watt285 Watt
Texture fill rate36.86689.0
Floating-point processing power0.3456 TFLOPS44.1 TFLOPS
ROPs2496
TMUs32264
Tensor Coresno data264
Ray Tracing Coresno data66

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length270 mm310 mm
Width2-slot3-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pin1x 16-pin
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount768 MB16 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz1313 MHz
Memory bandwidth86.4 GB/s672.3 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Video1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.06.8
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA+8.9

Pros & cons summary


Recency 8 November 2006 10 June 2024
Maximum RAM amount 768 MB 16 GB
Chip lithography 90 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 155 Watt 285 Watt

8800 GTX has 83.9% lower power consumption.

RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 17 years, a 2033.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1700% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 8800 GTX and GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTX
GeForce 8800 GTX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 140 votes

Rate GeForce 8800 GTX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 47 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.