GeForce FX 5800 vs 8800 GTX

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1045not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.02no data
Power efficiency0.65no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Rankine (2003−2005)
GPU code nameG80NV30
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date8 November 2006 (18 years ago)6 March 2003 (22 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$599 $299

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores575no data
Core clock speed576 MHz400 MHz
Number of transistors681 million125 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)155 Watt44 Watt
Texture fill rate36.863.200
Floating-point processing power0.3456 TFLOPSno data
ROPs244
TMUs328
L2 Cache96 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16AGP 8x
Length270 mm213 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pin1x Molex
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR
Maximum RAM amount768 MB128 MB
Memory bus width384 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz400 MHz
Memory bandwidth86.4 GB/s12.8 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Video1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)9.0a
Shader Model4.0no data
OpenGL3.31.5 (2.1)
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 8 November 2006 6 March 2003
Maximum RAM amount 768 MB 128 MB
Chip lithography 90 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 155 Watt 44 Watt

8800 GTX has an age advantage of 3 years, a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 44.4% more advanced lithography process.

FX 5800, on the other hand, has 252.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 8800 GTX and GeForce FX 5800. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTX
GeForce 8800 GTX
NVIDIA GeForce FX 5800
GeForce FX 5800

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 143 votes

Rate GeForce 8800 GTX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 27 votes

Rate GeForce FX 5800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 8800 GTX or GeForce FX 5800, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.