Radeon RX 6650M XT vs GeForce 8800 GTS 112

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated113
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data26.19
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)
GPU code nameG80Navi 23
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date19 November 2007 (18 years ago)4 January 2022 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1122048
Core clock speed500 MHz2068 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2416 MHz
Number of transistors681 million11,060 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt120 Watt
Texture fill rate28.00309.2
Floating-point processing power0.2688 TFLOPS9.896 TFLOPS
ROPs2064
TMUs28128
Ray Tracing Coresno data32
L0 Cacheno data512 KB
L1 Cacheno data512 KB
L2 Cache80 KB2 MB
L3 Cacheno data32 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount640 MB8 GB
Memory bus width320 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth64 GB/s256.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.06.5
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.12.1
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 19 November 2007 4 January 2022
Maximum RAM amount 640 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 90 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 120 Watt

RX 6650M XT has an age advantage of 14 years, a 1180% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 1185.7% more advanced lithography process, and 25% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112 and Radeon RX 6650M XT. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112 is a desktop graphics card while Radeon RX 6650M XT is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112
GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112
AMD Radeon RX 6650M XT
Radeon RX 6650M XT

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1.1 310 votes

Rate GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 79 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6650M XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112 or Radeon RX 6650M XT, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.