Radeon Pro Vega 64X vs GeForce 8800 GTS 112
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 192 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | no data | 9.85 |
| Architecture | Tesla (2006−2010) | GCN 5.0 (2017−2020) |
| GPU code name | G80 | Vega 10 |
| Market segment | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 19 November 2007 (18 years ago) | 19 March 2019 (7 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 112 | 4096 |
| Core clock speed | 500 MHz | 1250 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 1468 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 681 million | 12,500 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 90 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 28.00 | 375.8 |
| Floating-point processing power | 0.2688 TFLOPS | 12.03 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 20 | 64 |
| TMUs | 28 | 256 |
| L1 Cache | no data | 1 MB |
| L2 Cache | 80 KB | 4 MB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 267 mm | no data |
| Width | 2-slot | no data |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR3 | HBM2 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 640 MB | 16 GB |
| Memory bus width | 320 Bit | 2048 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 800 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 512.0 GB/s |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | No outputs |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.125 |
| CUDA | + | - |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 19 November 2007 | 19 March 2019 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 640 MB | 16 GB |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 250 Watt |
8800 GTS 112 has 67% lower power consumption.
Pro Vega 64X, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 years, a 2460% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 543% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112 and Radeon Pro Vega 64X. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112 is a desktop graphics card while Radeon Pro Vega 64X is a mobile workstation one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
