Radeon 625 vs GeForce 8800 GTS 112

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated792
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data3.96
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameG80Polaris 24
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date19 November 2007 (17 years ago)13 May 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores112384
Core clock speed500 MHz730 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1024 MHz
Number of transistors681 million1,550 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate28.0024.58
Floating-point processing power0.2688 TFLOPS0.7864 TFLOPS
ROPs208
TMUs2824

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x8
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR3
Maximum RAM amount640 MB2 GB
Memory bus width320 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz900 MHz
Memory bandwidth64 GB/s14.4 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 (12_0)
Shader Model4.06.3
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.12.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 19 November 2007 13 May 2019
Maximum RAM amount 640 MB 2 GB
Chip lithography 90 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 50 Watt

Radeon 625 has an age advantage of 11 years, a 220% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 221.4% more advanced lithography process, and 200% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112 and Radeon 625. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112 is a desktop card while Radeon 625 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112
GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112
AMD Radeon 625
Radeon 625

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1.1 308 votes

Rate GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 145 votes

Rate Radeon 625 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.