ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT Mac Edition vs GeForce 8800 GTS 112

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameG80M74
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date19 November 2007 (17 years ago)28 June 2007 (18 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores11240
Core clock speed500 MHz650 MHz
Number of transistors681 million180 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Wattno data
Texture fill rate28.002.600
Floating-point processing power0.2688 TFLOPS0.052 TFLOPS
ROPs204
TMUs284
L2 Cache80 KB32 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount640 MB128 MB
Memory bus width320 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth64 GB/s12.8 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)10.0 (10_0)
Shader Model4.04.0
OpenGL3.33.3
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 19 November 2007 28 June 2007
Maximum RAM amount 640 MB 128 MB
Chip lithography 90 nm 65 nm

8800 GTS 112 has an age advantage of 4 months, and a 400% higher maximum VRAM amount.

ATI Mobility HD 2400 XT Mac Edition, on the other hand, has a 38.5% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112 and Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT Mac Edition. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112 is a desktop graphics card while Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT Mac Edition is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112
GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT Mac Edition
Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT Mac Edition

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1.1 309 votes

Rate GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.4 5 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT Mac Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112 or Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT Mac Edition, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.