ATI Mobility Radeon 9600 PRO Turbo vs GeForce 8800 GTS 112

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Rage 8 (2002−2007)
GPU code nameG80M10
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date19 November 2007 (18 years ago)13 February 2004 (22 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores112no data
Core clock speed500 MHz337 MHz
Number of transistors681 million76 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Wattno data
Texture fill rate28.001.348
Floating-point processing power0.2688 TFLOPSno data
ROPs204
TMUs284
L2 Cache80 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16AGP 8x
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR
Maximum RAM amount640 MB128 MB
Memory bus width320 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz243 MHz
Memory bandwidth64 GB/s7.776 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)9.0 (9_0)
Shader Model4.0no data
OpenGL3.32.0
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 19 November 2007 13 February 2004
Maximum RAM amount 640 MB 128 MB
Chip lithography 90 nm 130 nm

8800 GTS 112 has an age advantage of 3 years, a 400% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 44% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112 and Mobility Radeon 9600 PRO Turbo. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112 is a desktop graphics card while Mobility Radeon 9600 PRO Turbo is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1.1 310 votes

Rate GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon 9600 PRO Turbo on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112 or Mobility Radeon 9600 PRO Turbo, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.