GMA 3000 vs GeForce 8800 GTS 112

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Generation 4.0 (2006−2007)
GPU code nameG80Broadwater
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date19 November 2007 (17 years ago)1 June 2006 (19 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores112no data
Core clock speed500 MHz400 MHz
Number of transistors681 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology90 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt13 Watt
Texture fill rate28.001.600
Floating-point processing power0.2688 TFLOPSno data
ROPs204
TMUs284

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount640 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width320 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed800 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth64 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)9.0c
Shader Model4.03.0
OpenGL3.32.0
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 19 November 2007 1 June 2006
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 13 Watt

8800 GTS 112 has an age advantage of 1 year.

GMA 3000, on the other hand, has 1053.8% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112 and GMA 3000. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112 is a desktop graphics card while GMA 3000 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112
GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112
Intel GMA 3000
GMA 3000

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1.1 309 votes

Rate GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 45 votes

Rate GMA 3000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112 or GMA 3000, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.