Radeon HD 7560G IGP vs GeForce 8800 GTS 640

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)TeraScale 3 (2010−2013)
GPU code nameG80Devastator Lite
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date8 November 2006 (18 years ago)15 May 2012 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$449 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores96256
Core clock speed513 MHz496 MHz
Boost clock speedno data760 MHz
Number of transistors681 million1,303 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm32 nm
Power consumption (TDP)143 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate24.6212.16
Floating-point processing power0.2281 TFLOPS0.3891 TFLOPS
ROPs208
TMUs2416

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16IGP
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount640 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width320 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed792 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth63.36 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model4.05.0
OpenGL3.34.4
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 8 November 2006 15 May 2012
Chip lithography 90 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 143 Watt 35 Watt

HD 7560G IGP has an age advantage of 5 years, a 181.3% more advanced lithography process, and 308.6% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 8800 GTS 640 and Radeon HD 7560G IGP. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 8800 GTS 640 is a desktop graphics card while Radeon HD 7560G IGP is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 640
GeForce 8800 GTS 640
AMD Radeon HD 7560G IGP
Radeon HD 7560G IGP

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 47 votes

Rate GeForce 8800 GTS 640 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 2 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7560G IGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 8800 GTS 640 or Radeon HD 7560G IGP, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.