Quadro4 750 XGL vs GeForce 8800 GTS 512

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1059not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.04no data
Power efficiency0.75no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Kelvin (2001−2003)
GPU code nameG92NV25 A2
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date11 December 2007 (17 years ago)19 February 2002 (23 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$349 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores128no data
Core clock speed650 MHz275 MHz
Number of transistors754 million63 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)135 Wattno data
Texture fill rate41.602.200
Floating-point processing power0.416 TFLOPSno data
ROPs168
TMUs648
L2 Cache64 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16AGP 4x
Length254 mmno data
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR
Maximum RAM amount512 MB128 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed820 MHz225 MHz
Memory bandwidth52.48 GB/s7.2 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Video2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)8.1
Shader Model4.0no data
OpenGL3.31.3
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA1.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 11 December 2007 19 February 2002
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 128 MB
Chip lithography 65 nm 150 nm

8800 GTS 512 has an age advantage of 5 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 130.8% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 8800 GTS 512 and Quadro4 750 XGL. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 8800 GTS 512 is a desktop graphics card while Quadro4 750 XGL is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 512
GeForce 8800 GTS 512
NVIDIA Quadro4 750 XGL
Quadro4 750 XGL

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 136 votes

Rate GeForce 8800 GTS 512 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 1 vote

Rate Quadro4 750 XGL on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 8800 GTS 512 or Quadro4 750 XGL, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.