GeForce 8800 GTS 512 vs HD Graphics 630

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

HD Graphics 630
2017
65536 Mb DDR3L/LPDDR3/LPDDR4
3.09
+110%

HD Graphics 630 outperforms GeForce 8800 GTS 512 by 110% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking718939
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money0.090.04
ArchitectureGen. 9.5 Kaby Lake (2015−2017)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameKaby-Lake-H-GT2G92
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date1 January 2017 (7 years old)11 December 2007 (16 years old)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$349
Current price$370 $146 (0.4x MSRP)

Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

HD Graphics 630 has 125% better value for money than 8800 GTS 512.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores24128
Core clock speed300 MHz650 MHz
Boost clock speed1150 MHzno data
Number of transistors189 million754 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt135 Watt
Texture fill rate26.4041.60
Floating-point performance441.6 gflops416.0 gflops

Size and compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x1PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data254 mm
WidthIGP2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3L/LPDDR3/LPDDR4GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount64 GB512 MB
Memory bus width64/128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1640 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data52.48 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI, 1x S-Video

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model6.44.0
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL2.11.1
Vulkan+N/A
CUDAno data1.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD Graphics 630 3.09
+110%
8800 GTS 512 1.47

HD Graphics 630 outperforms GeForce 8800 GTS 512 by 110% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

HD Graphics 630 1197
+111%
8800 GTS 512 568

HD Graphics 630 outperforms GeForce 8800 GTS 512 by 111% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD15
+114%
7−8
−114%
1440p64
+113%
30−35
−113%
4K13
+117%
6−7
−117%

Performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5
+150%
2−3
−150%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 0−1
Battlefield 5 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
+117%
6−7
−117%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
Far Cry 5 6
+200%
2−3
−200%
Far Cry New Dawn 5
+150%
2−3
−150%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
Hitman 3 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
Horizon Zero Dawn 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 5
+150%
2−3
−150%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3 0−1

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 0−1
Battlefield 5 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
+117%
6−7
−117%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
Far Cry 5 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
Hitman 3 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
Horizon Zero Dawn 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Metro Exodus 2 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−11
+150%
4−5
−150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3 0−1

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 0−1
Battlefield 5 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
Far Cry 5 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3 0−1

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Hitman 3 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−11
+150%
4−5
−150%
Metro Exodus 1−2 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 0−1
Far Cry 5 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3 0−1
Hitman 3 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Horizon Zero Dawn 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2 0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Far Cry New Dawn 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%

This is how HD Graphics 630 and 8800 GTS 512 compete in popular games:

1080p resolution:

  • HD Graphics 630 is 114% faster than 8800 GTS 512

1440p resolution:

  • HD Graphics 630 is 113% faster than 8800 GTS 512

4K resolution:

  • HD Graphics 630 is 117% faster than 8800 GTS 512

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 3.09 1.47
Recency 1 January 2017 11 December 2007
Maximum RAM amount 64 GB 512 MB
Chip lithography 14 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 135 Watt

The HD Graphics 630 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 8800 GTS 512 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics 630
HD Graphics 630
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 512
GeForce 8800 GTS 512

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User Ratings

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 1074 votes

Rate HD Graphics 630 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 123 votes

Rate GeForce 8800 GTS 512 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.