Tesla V100 PCIe vs GeForce 8800 GTS 320

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Volta (2017−2020)
GPU code nameG80GV100
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date12 February 2007 (17 years ago)21 June 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$269 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores965120
Core clock speed513 MHz1246 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1380 MHz
Number of transistors681 million21,100 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)143 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate24.62441.6
Floating-point processing power0.2281 TFLOPSno data
ROPs20128
TMUs24320

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3HBM2
Maximum RAM amount320 MB16 GB
Memory bus width320 Bit4096 Bit
Memory clock speed792 MHz1758 MHz
Memory bandwidth63.36 GB/s900.1 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12.0
Shader Model4.05.0
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.12.0
VulkanN/A-
CUDA+7.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 12 February 2007 21 June 2017
Maximum RAM amount 320 MB 16 GB
Chip lithography 90 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 143 Watt 250 Watt

8800 GTS 320 has 74.8% lower power consumption.

Tesla V100 PCIe, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 years, a 5020% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 650% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 8800 GTS 320 and Tesla V100 PCIe. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 8800 GTS 320 is a desktop card while Tesla V100 PCIe is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 320
GeForce 8800 GTS 320
NVIDIA Tesla V100 PCIe
Tesla V100 PCIe

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 26 votes

Rate GeForce 8800 GTS 320 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 114 votes

Rate Tesla V100 PCIe on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.