Radeon Pro W6900X vs GeForce 8800 GTS 320

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameG80Navi 21
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date12 February 2007 (17 years ago)3 August 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$269 $4,999

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores965120
Core clock speed513 MHz1825 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2150 MHz
Number of transistors681 million26,800 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)143 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate24.62688.0
Floating-point processing power0.2281 TFLOPS22.02 TFLOPS
ROPs20128
TMUs24320
Ray Tracing Coresno data80

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length267 mm267 mm
Width2-slotQuad-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount320 MB32 GB
Memory bus width320 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed792 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth63.36 GB/s512.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Video1x HDMI, 4x Thunderbolt
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.06.5
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.12.1
VulkanN/A1.2
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 12 February 2007 3 August 2021
Maximum RAM amount 320 MB 32 GB
Chip lithography 90 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 143 Watt 300 Watt

8800 GTS 320 has 109.8% lower power consumption.

Pro W6900X, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 14 years, a 10140% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1185.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 8800 GTS 320 and Radeon Pro W6900X. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 8800 GTS 320 is a desktop card while Radeon Pro W6900X is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 320
GeForce 8800 GTS 320
AMD Radeon Pro W6900X
Radeon Pro W6900X

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 26 votes

Rate GeForce 8800 GTS 320 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 67 votes

Rate Radeon Pro W6900X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.