ATI FireMV 2250 PCIe x1 vs GeForce 8800 GTS 320

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Ultra-Threaded SE (2005−2007)
GPU code nameG80RV516
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date12 February 2007 (18 years ago)2007 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$269 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores96no data
Core clock speed513 MHz600 MHz
Number of transistors681 million105 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)143 Watt32 Watt
Texture fill rate24.622.400
Floating-point processing power0.2281 TFLOPSno data
ROPs204
TMUs244
L2 Cache80 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x1
Length267 mm170 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR2
Maximum RAM amount320 MB256 MB
Memory bus width320 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed792 MHz800 MBps
Memory bandwidth63.36 GB/s12.8 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Video1x S-Video, 1x DMS-59

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model4.03.0
OpenGL3.32.1
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 320 MB 256 MB
Power consumption (TDP) 143 Watt 32 Watt

8800 GTS 320 has a 25% higher maximum VRAM amount.

ATI FireMV 2250 PCIe x1, on the other hand, has 346.9% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 8800 GTS 320 and FireMV 2250 PCIe x1. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 320
GeForce 8800 GTS 320
ATI FireMV 2250 PCIe x1
FireMV 2250 PCIe x1

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 30 votes

Rate GeForce 8800 GTS 320 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate FireMV 2250 PCIe x1 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 8800 GTS 320 or FireMV 2250 PCIe x1, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.