Tesla X2090 vs GeForce 8800 GS

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1208not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.58no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)
GPU code nameG92GF110
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date31 January 2008 (18 years ago)25 July 2011 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores96512
Core clock speed550 MHz651 MHz
Number of transistors754 million3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)105 Watt225 Watt
Texture fill rate26.4041.66
Floating-point processing power0.264 TFLOPS1.332 TFLOPS
ROPs1248
TMUs4864
L1 Cacheno data1 MB
L2 Cache48 KB768 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length229 mmno data
Width1-slotMXM Module
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount384 MB6 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz924 MHz
Memory bandwidth38.4 GB/s177.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Model4.05.1
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.11.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA1.12.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 31 January 2008 25 July 2011
Maximum RAM amount 384 MB 6 GB
Chip lithography 65 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 105 Watt 225 Watt

8800 GS has 114% lower power consumption.

Tesla X2090, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 63% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 8800 GS and Tesla X2090. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 8800 GS is a desktop graphics card while Tesla X2090 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 59 votes

Rate GeForce 8800 GS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 14 votes

Rate Tesla X2090 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 8800 GS or Tesla X2090, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.