Radeon Sky 700 vs GeForce 8800 GS

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1206not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.58no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameG92Tahiti
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date31 January 2008 (18 years ago)27 March 2013 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores961792
Core clock speed550 MHz900 MHz
Number of transistors754 million4,313 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)105 Watt225 Watt
Texture fill rate26.40100.8
Floating-point processing power0.264 TFLOPS3.226 TFLOPS
ROPs1232
TMUs48112
L1 Cacheno data448 KB
L2 Cache48 KB768 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportno dataPCIe 3.0
InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length229 mm267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Form factorno datafull height / full length
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount384 MB6 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz1375 MHz
Memory bandwidth38.4 GB/s176 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Video1x DisplayPort
DisplayPort countno data1
Dual-link DVI support-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 (11_1)
Shader Model4.05.1
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA1.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 31 January 2008 27 March 2013
Maximum RAM amount 384 MB 6 GB
Chip lithography 65 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 105 Watt 225 Watt

8800 GS has 114.3% lower power consumption.

Sky 700, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 132.1% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 8800 GS and Radeon Sky 700. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 8800 GS is a desktop graphics card while Radeon Sky 700 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GS
GeForce 8800 GS
AMD Radeon Sky 700
Radeon Sky 700

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 59 votes

Rate GeForce 8800 GS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Radeon Sky 700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 8800 GS or Radeon Sky 700, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.