Radeon R5 A230 vs GeForce 8800 GS

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1202not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.58no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameG92Jet
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date31 January 2008 (17 years ago)7 January 2014 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores96320
Core clock speed550 MHz780 MHz
Boost clock speedno data855 MHz
Number of transistors754 million690 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)105 Wattno data
Texture fill rate26.4017.10
Floating-point processing power0.264 TFLOPS0.5472 TFLOPS
ROPs128
TMUs4820
L1 Cacheno data80 KB
L2 Cache48 KB128 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x8
Length229 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR3
Maximum RAM amount384 MB4 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz1000 MHz
Memory bandwidth38.4 GB/s16 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 (11_1)
Shader Model4.05.1
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA1.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 31 January 2008 7 January 2014
Maximum RAM amount 384 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 65 nm 28 nm

R5 A230 has an age advantage of 5 years, a 966.7% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 132.1% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 8800 GS and Radeon R5 A230. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 8800 GS is a desktop graphics card while Radeon R5 A230 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GS
GeForce 8800 GS
AMD Radeon R5 A230
Radeon R5 A230

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 59 votes

Rate GeForce 8800 GS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon R5 A230 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 8800 GS or Radeon R5 A230, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.