Radeon Pro 575X vs GeForce 8800 GS

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1199not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.58no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameG92Polaris 20
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date31 January 2008 (17 years ago)18 March 2019 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores962048
Core clock speed550 MHz1096 MHz
Number of transistors754 million5,700 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)105 Watt120 Watt
Texture fill rate26.40140.3
Floating-point processing power0.264 TFLOPS4.489 TFLOPS
ROPs1232
TMUs48128
L1 Cacheno data512 KB
L2 Cache48 KB2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length229 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount384 MB4 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz1700 MHz
Memory bandwidth38.4 GB/s217.6 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 (12_0)
Shader Model4.06.4
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.12.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA1.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 31 January 2008 18 March 2019
Maximum RAM amount 384 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 65 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 105 Watt 120 Watt

8800 GS has 14.3% lower power consumption.

Pro 575X, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 years, a 966.7% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 364.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 8800 GS and Radeon Pro 575X. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 8800 GS is a desktop graphics card while Radeon Pro 575X is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GS
GeForce 8800 GS
AMD Radeon Pro 575X
Radeon Pro 575X

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 59 votes

Rate GeForce 8800 GS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 24 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 575X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 8800 GS or Radeon Pro 575X, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.