GeForce 8800 GS vs Radeon HD 7660D

Place in performance ranking	988	1090
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Value for money	0.03	0.01
Architecture	Terascale 3 (2010−2013)	Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code name	Trinity	G92
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	26 September 2012 (11 years old)	31 January 2008 (16 years old)
Launch price (MSRP)	$122	no data
Current price	$41 (0.3x MSRP)	$145

Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

HD 7660D has 200% better value for money than 8800 GS.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	384	96
Core clock speed	633 MHz	550 MHz
Boost clock speed	800 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	1,303 million	754 million
Manufacturing process technology	32 nm	65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	100 Watt	105 Watt
Texture fill rate	19.20	26.40
Floating-point performance	no data	264 gflops

Size and compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	IGP	PCIe 1.0 x16
Length	no data	229 mm
Width	IGP	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	1x 6-pin

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	System Shared	GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount	System Shared	384 MB
Memory bus width	System Shared	192 Bit
Memory clock speed	System Shared	1600 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	38.4 GB/s
Shared memory	+	no data

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.2 (11_0)	11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model	5.0	4.0
OpenGL	4.4	3.3
OpenCL	1.2	1.1
Vulkan	N/A	N/A
CUDA	no data	1.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD 7660D 1.30
+52.9%

8800 GS 0.85

Radeon HD 7660D outperforms GeForce 8800 GS by 53% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

HD 7660D 504
+52.7%

8800 GS 330

Radeon HD 7660D outperforms GeForce 8800 GS by 53% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

17
+70%

10−12

−70%

Performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

4−5
+100%

2−3

−100%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	9−10 +80%	5−6 −80%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 +100%	2−3 −100%
Forza Horizon 4	1−2	0−1
Hitman 3	1−2	0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn	1−2	0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	7−8 +75%	4−5 −75%

Full HD
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	9−10 +80%	5−6 −80%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 +100%	2−3 −100%
Forza Horizon 4	1−2	0−1
Hitman 3	1−2	0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn	1−2	0−1
Metro Exodus	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
Red Dead Redemption 2	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	7−8 +75%	4−5 −75%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 +100%	2−3 −100%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 +100%	2−3 −100%
Forza Horizon 4	1−2	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 +100%	2−3 −100%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
Hitman 3	4−5 +100%	2−3 −100%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 +60%	5−6 −60%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	5−6 +66.7%	3−4 −66.7%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	1−2	0−1
Far Cry 5	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
Hitman 3	1−2	0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn	7−8 +75%	4−5 −75%
Red Dead Redemption 2	0−1	0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	0−1	0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	0−1
Far Cry 5	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
Far Cry New Dawn	5−6 +66.7%	3−4 −66.7%

This is how HD 7660D and 8800 GS compete in popular games:

1080p resolution:

HD 7660D is 70% faster than 8800 GS

Advantages and disadvantages

Performance score	1.30	0.85
Recency	26 September 2012	31 January 2008
Maximum RAM amount	System Shared	384 MB
Chip lithography	32 nm	65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	100 Watt	105 Watt