Radeon 550X Mobile vs GeForce 8800 GS

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1198not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.58no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameG92Polaris 23
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date31 January 2008 (17 years ago)11 April 2018 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores96640
Core clock speed550 MHz1100 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1287 MHz
Number of transistors754 million2,200 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)105 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate26.4051.48
Floating-point processing power0.264 TFLOPS1.647 TFLOPS
ROPs1216
TMUs4840
L1 Cacheno data160 KB
L2 Cache48 KB256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x8
Length229 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount384 MB4 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth38.4 GB/s48 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 (12_0)
Shader Model4.06.4
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.12.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA1.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 31 January 2008 11 April 2018
Maximum RAM amount 384 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 65 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 105 Watt 50 Watt

550X Mobile has an age advantage of 10 years, a 966.7% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 364.3% more advanced lithography process, and 110% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 8800 GS and Radeon 550X Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 8800 GS is a desktop graphics card while Radeon 550X Mobile is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GS
GeForce 8800 GS
AMD Radeon 550X Mobile
Radeon 550X Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 59 votes

Rate GeForce 8800 GS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.6 8 votes

Rate Radeon 550X Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 8800 GS or Radeon 550X Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.