Quadro 3000M X2 vs GeForce 8800 GS

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1198not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.58no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code nameG92EXMF104
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date31 January 2008 (17 years ago)22 February 2011 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores96240 ×2
Core clock speed550 MHz450 MHz
Number of transistors754 million1,950 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)105 Watt150 Watt
Texture fill rate26.4018.00 ×2
Floating-point processing power0.264 TFLOPS0.432 TFLOPS ×2
ROPs1232 ×2
TMUs4840 ×2
L1 Cacheno data320 KB
L2 Cache48 KB512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16MXM-B (3.0)
Length229 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount384 MB2 GB ×2
Memory bus width192 Bit256 Bit ×2
Memory clock speed800 MHz625 MHz
Memory bandwidth38.4 GB/s80 GB/s ×2

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Model4.05.1
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.11.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA1.12.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 31 January 2008 22 February 2011
Maximum RAM amount 384 MB 2 GB
Chip lithography 65 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 105 Watt 150 Watt

8800 GS has 42.9% lower power consumption.

3000M X2, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 433.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 62.5% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 8800 GS and Quadro 3000M X2. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 8800 GS is a desktop graphics card while Quadro 3000M X2 is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GS
GeForce 8800 GS
NVIDIA Quadro 3000M X2
Quadro 3000M X2

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 59 votes

Rate GeForce 8800 GS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro 3000M X2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 8800 GS or Quadro 3000M X2, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.