PG506-232 vs GeForce 8800 GS

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1199not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.58no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameG92GA100
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date31 January 2008 (17 years ago)12 April 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores963584
Core clock speed550 MHz930 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1440 MHz
Number of transistors754 million54,200 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)105 Watt165 Watt
Texture fill rate26.40322.6
Floating-point processing power0.264 TFLOPS10.32 TFLOPS
ROPs1296
TMUs48224
Tensor Coresno data224
L1 Cacheno data10.5 MB
L2 Cache48 KB24 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length229 mm267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin8-pin EPS

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3HBM2
Maximum RAM amount384 MB24 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit3072 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz1215 MHz
Memory bandwidth38.4 GB/s933.1 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)N/A
Shader Model4.0N/A
OpenGL3.3N/A
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA1.18.0
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 31 January 2008 12 April 2021
Maximum RAM amount 384 MB 24 GB
Chip lithography 65 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 105 Watt 165 Watt

8800 GS has 57.1% lower power consumption.

PG506-232, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 13 years, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 828.6% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 8800 GS and PG506-232. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 8800 GS is a desktop graphics card while PG506-232 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GS
GeForce 8800 GS
NVIDIA PG506-232
PG506-232

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 59 votes

Rate GeForce 8800 GS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate PG506-232 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 8800 GS or PG506-232, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.