ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3400 vs GeForce 8800 GS

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1206not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.58no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)RV6xx (2008−2010)
GPU code nameG92no data
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date31 January 2008 (18 years ago)1 August 2010 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores96no data
Core clock speed550 MHzno data
Number of transistors754 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology65 nmno data
Power consumption (TDP)105 Wattno data
Texture fill rate26.40no data
Floating-point processing power0.264 TFLOPSno data
ROPs12no data
TMUs48no data
L2 Cache48 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16no data
Length229 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3no data
Maximum RAM amount384 MBno data
Memory bus width192 Bitno data
Memory clock speed800 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth38.4 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Videono data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)no data
Shader Model4.0no data
OpenGL3.3no data
OpenCL1.1no data
VulkanN/A-
CUDA1.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 31 January 2008 1 August 2010

ATI Mobility HD 3400 has an age advantage of 2 years.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 8800 GS and Mobility Radeon HD 3400. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 8800 GS is a desktop graphics card while Mobility Radeon HD 3400 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GS
GeForce 8800 GS
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3400
Mobility Radeon HD 3400

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 59 votes

Rate GeForce 8800 GS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 66 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 3400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 8800 GS or Mobility Radeon HD 3400, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.