FirePro V7900 SDI vs GeForce 8800 GS

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1204not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.58no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)TeraScale 3 (2010−2013)
GPU code nameG92Cayman
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date31 January 2008 (17 years ago)24 May 2011 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores961280
Core clock speed550 MHz725 MHz
Number of transistors754 million2,640 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)105 Watt224 Watt
Texture fill rate26.4058.00
Floating-point processing power0.264 TFLOPS1.856 TFLOPS
ROPs1232
TMUs4880
L1 Cacheno data320 KB
L2 Cache48 KB512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportno dataPCIe 2.1 x16
InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length229 mm279 mm
Width1-slot1-slot
Form factorno datafull height / full length
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount384 MB2 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth38.4 GB/s160 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Video4x SDI
StereoOutput3D-+
DisplayPort countno data4
Dual-link DVI support-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model4.05.0
OpenGL3.34.4
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA1.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 31 January 2008 24 May 2011
Maximum RAM amount 384 MB 2 GB
Chip lithography 65 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 105 Watt 224 Watt

8800 GS has 113.3% lower power consumption.

V7900 SDI, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 433.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 62.5% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 8800 GS and FirePro V7900 SDI. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 8800 GS is a desktop graphics card while FirePro V7900 SDI is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GS
GeForce 8800 GS
AMD FirePro V7900 SDI
FirePro V7900 SDI

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 59 votes

Rate GeForce 8800 GS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate FirePro V7900 SDI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 8800 GS or FirePro V7900 SDI, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.