Radeon R7 240 OEM vs GeForce 8800 GS Mac Edition

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameG92Oland
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date31 January 2008 (17 years ago)1 November 2013 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores64320
Core clock speed500 MHz730 MHz
Boost clock speedno data780 MHz
Number of transistors754 million950 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)105 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate16.0015.60
Floating-point processing power0.16 TFLOPS0.4992 TFLOPS
ROPs168
TMUs3220
L1 Cacheno data80 KB
L2 Cache64 KB256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceMXM-HEPCIe 3.0 x8
WidthMXM Module1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR3
Maximum RAM amount512 MB2 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed799 MHz900 MHz
Memory bandwidth51.14 GB/s28.8 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 (11_1)
Shader Model4.05.1
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA1.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 31 January 2008 1 November 2013
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 2 GB
Chip lithography 65 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 105 Watt 50 Watt

R7 240 OEM has an age advantage of 5 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 132.1% more advanced lithography process, and 110% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 8800 GS Mac Edition and Radeon R7 240 OEM. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GS Mac Edition
GeForce 8800 GS Mac Edition
AMD Radeon R7 240 OEM
Radeon R7 240 OEM

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 1 vote

Rate GeForce 8800 GS Mac Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 56 votes

Rate Radeon R7 240 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 8800 GS Mac Edition or Radeon R7 240 OEM, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.