Radeon HD 6510 vs GeForce 8700M GT SLI

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1210not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.96no data
ArchitectureG8x (2007)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameNB8E-SETurks
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date18 September 2007 (18 years ago)14 May 2011 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores64320
Core clock speed625 MHz650 MHz
Number of transistors578 Million716 million
Manufacturing process technology80 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)58 Watt39 Watt
Texture fill rateno data10.40
Floating-point processing powerno data0.416 TFLOPS
ROPsno data8
TMUsno data16
L1 Cacheno data32 KB
L2 Cacheno data256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data165 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount1 GB1 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz667 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data21.34 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1011.2 (11_0)
Shader Modelno data5.0
OpenGLno data4.4
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 18 September 2007 14 May 2011
Chip lithography 80 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 58 Watt 39 Watt

HD 6510 has an age advantage of 3 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 48.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 8700M GT SLI and Radeon HD 6510. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 8700M GT SLI is a notebook graphics card while Radeon HD 6510 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 8700M GT SLI
GeForce 8700M GT SLI
AMD Radeon HD 6510
Radeon HD 6510

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2 4 votes

Rate GeForce 8700M GT SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 42 votes

Rate Radeon HD 6510 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 8700M GT SLI or Radeon HD 6510, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.