Radeon RX 6300 XT vs GeForce 8600M GT SLI

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureG8x (2007)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)
GPU code nameNB8P-GSNavi 24
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date23 October 2007 (18 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores641024
Core clock speed475 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data2500 MHz
Number of transistors598 Millionno data
Manufacturing process technology80 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)20 Watt100 Watt
Texture fill rateno data160.0
Floating-point processing powerno data5.12 TFLOPS
ROPsno data32
TMUsno data64

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x8
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3, GDDR2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed700 MHz16 GB/s
Memory bandwidthno data128.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1012 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.6
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.1
Vulkan-1.2

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 80 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 20 Watt 100 Watt

8600M GT SLI has 400% lower power consumption.

RX 6300 XT, on the other hand, has a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1042.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 8600M GT SLI and Radeon RX 6300 XT. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 8600M GT SLI is a notebook graphics card while Radeon RX 6300 XT is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 8600M GT SLI
GeForce 8600M GT SLI
AMD Radeon RX 6300 XT
Radeon RX 6300 XT

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2 2 votes

Rate GeForce 8600M GT SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 20 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6300 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 8600M GT SLI or Radeon RX 6300 XT, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.